International Approaches to Professional Development for Mathematics Teachers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Experiences Developed in Different Countries to support the Professional Development of Teachers for, in, and from Practice: Introduction to the Purpose of the Book -- Nadine Bednarz (Universite du Quebec a Montreal, Canada), Dario Fiorentini, (UNICAMP, Brazil), Rongjin Huang, (University of Colorado Denver, USA) PART 1: EDUCATION OF PRACTICING TEACHERS IN MATHEMATICS - INTERNATIONAL HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT AND ISSUES Situating Mathematics Teacher Education in a Global Context -- Barbara Jaworski (Loughborough University, UK) PART 2: PROFESSIONAL LIFE OF MATHEMATICS TEACHERS AS PART OF THEIR PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT-IN-PRACTICE Professional Development of a Mathematics Teacher in the Role of a Subject Leader -- Claudia Canha Nunes (University of Lisbon, Portugal) Mentoring as Professional Development: A Case from Secondary Level Mathematics -- Ginger Rhodes (University of North Carolina Wilmington, USA), Patricia S. Wilson (University of Georgia, USA) Facilitating Mathematics Teachers' Professional Development through Ranking and Promotion Practices in the Chinese Mainland -- Yeping Li (Texas A&M University, USA), Rongjin Huang (University of Colorado Denver, USA), Jiansheng Bao (Suzhou University, China), Yadong Fan (Suzhou Secondary School, China) PART 3: CONSTRUCTION OF PROFESSIONAL MATHEMATICAL KNOWLEDGE BY TEACHERS Secondary Teachers' Professional Development through the Exploration of School Mathematics -- Jerome Proulx (Universite du Quebec a Montreal, Canada) Dialogue among In-service Teachers in an Internet-based Mathematics Education Program -- Mario Sanchez (Roskilde University, Denmark) In-service Professional Development for Teachers of Pre-University Mathematics -- Bernard Murphy (Mathematics in Education and Industry, UK) PART 4: DIFFERENT EXPERIENCES SUPPORTING PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT IN MATHEMATICAL TEACHING In-service Teacher Education: A Collaborative Experience with Non-Specialist Teachers who Teach Mathematics. -- Nielce Meneguelo da Costa (Bandeirante University of Sao Paulo, Brazil) Formative Processes: Sharing Learning Experiences in Geometry -- Adair Mendes Nacarato and Regina Celia Grando (Sao Francisco University, Brazil) Collaborative Work and Professional Development of Mathematics Teachers: Analysis of a Brazilian Experience. -- Ana Cristina Ferreira (UFOP, Brazil), Maria Angela Miorim (UNICAMP, Brazil) Assessing a Research/Professional Development Model in Patterns and Algebra. -- Ruth Beatty (University of Toronto, Canada), Cathy Bruce (Trent University, Canada) Professional Development: Moving from Telling to Listening. -- Christine Suurtamm and Nancy Vezina (University of Ottawa, Canada) Continuing Professional Education of Mathematics Teachers: Learning through Mathematics Investigation -- Carmen Lucia Brancaglion Passos and Maiza Lamonato (Universidade Federal de Sao Carlos, Brazil) The Role of Self-Regulated Learning in Professional Development of Mathematics Elementary Teachers -- Bracha Kramarski and Tali Revach (Bar-Ilan University, Israel) Investigating and Writing in the Professional Development of Mathematics Teachers -- Maria Teresa Menezes Freitas (UFU, Brazil), Dario Fiorentini (UNICAMP, Brazil) PART 5: REFORMS, CURRICULAR CHANGE AND CONTINUOUS PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT Factors affecting the Implementation of Reforms in Secondary School Mathematics. -- Naomi Chissick (ORT, Israel) Interrelations between Teacher Development and Curricular Change: A Research Program -- Dario Fiorentini (UNICAMP, Brazil), Rosana G. S. Miskulin (University Estadual Paulista, Brazil), Regina C. Grando and Adair M. Nacarato (University of Sao Francisco, Brazil), Carmen L.B. Passos (University of Sao Carlos, Brazil), Dione L. Carvalho (UNICAMP, Brazil) Researching Effective Continuing Professional Development in Mathematics Education. -- Els de Geest (University of Oxford, UK),Marie Joubert, Rosamund Sutherland (University of Bristol, UK), Jenni Back (Kings College London, UK), Christine Hirst (Birmingham University, UK) CONCLUSION -- Nadine Bednarz (Universite du Quebec a Montreal, Canada), Dario Fiorentini (UNICAMP, Brazil), Rongjin Huang (University of Colorado Denver, USA)
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.026 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".