Automatic detection of foreign body objects in neurosurgery using a deep learning approach on intraoperative ultrasound images: From animal models to first in-human testing
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objects accidentally left behind in the brain following neurosurgical procedures may lead to life-threatening health complications and invasive reoperation. One of the most commonly retained surgical items is the cotton ball, which absorbs blood to clear the surgeon's field of view yet in the process becomes visually indistinguishable from the brain parenchyma. However, using ultrasound imaging, the different acoustic properties of cotton and brain tissue result in two discernible materials. In this study, we created a fully automated foreign body object tracking algorithm that integrates into the clinical workflow to detect and localize retained cotton balls in the brain. This deep learning algorithm uses a custom convolutional neural network and achieves 99% accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity, and surpasses other comparable algorithms. Furthermore, the trained algorithm was implemented into web and smartphone applications with the ability to detect one cotton ball in an uploaded ultrasound image in under half of a second. This study also highlights the first use of a foreign body object detection algorithm using real in-human datasets, showing its ability to prevent accidental foreign body retention in a translational setting.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it