Structural and geochemical studies of the Palaeozoic granites from Dalhousie region of Himachal Himalaya: Implications on petrogenesis and deformation of strongly peraluminous S‐type granites
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Palaeozoic granites forming the Dalhousie pluton occur as an elongated body intruded into the core of an antiform in Salkhala metasedimentary rocks and are referred to herein as Dalhousie granites (DG). The studied mesoscopic structures, for example, well‐developed and randomly distributed megacrysts of K‐feldspar at the core part of massif, show undeformed porphyritic nature, whereas augen along with the mylonitic foliation and parallelly aligned feldspar megacrysts are dipping towards north‐north‐east (NNE) in the marginal part. The presence of aplite veins is evidence of final stage crystallization, where these rocks rapidly crystallized from siliceous residual fluids/solutions that escaped along fractures in the granites. Moreover, the granites show intrusive as well as thrusted contact with the Chamba metamorphics. The microscopic study from the marginal parts shows the dynamic recrystallization of quartz along with the fractures filled with secondary material oriented opposite to the top‐to‐the‐SW. Whereas euhedral quartz grains with undeformed grain boundaries, compositional zoning in plagioclase, and magmatic (perthite) texture of K‐feldspar are present in the core of Dalhousie pluton. In addition, a new whole‐rock geochemical dataset of DG is presented and investigated to elucidate the petrogenesis and tectonic environment. The geochemical data shows that DG (dominantly monzogranites) are formed from a pelitic source‐derived, (molar Al 2 O 3 /CaO + Na 2 O + K 2 O > 1.1) strongly peraluminous (S‐type) calc‐alkaline magma. This magma was generated by muscovite vapour absent dehydration melting. Harker bivariate plots indicate that fractional crystallization was a dominant process during the evolution of these granites. The tectonic discrimination diagrams suggest that DG were generated in syn‐collisional setting. Exceptionally high Pb in DG occurred due to primary melt generation at low‐temperature during partial melting (low‐degree melting) of the pelitic source rock. Trace and rare earth elements characteristics, such as positive anomaly of Zr show a notable amount of zircon as one of the accumulating phases. A pronounced negative Eu anomaly (Eu N /Eu* = 0.04–0.66), along with high silica content and highly varied trace element ratios in these rocks, show that these are fairly evolved granites.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".