MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Non-Visual and Contactless Wellness Monitoring for Long Term Care Facilities Using mm-Wave Radar Sensors

2022· article· en· W4311413841 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venue2022 IEEE Sensors · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNon-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRadarComputer scienceSupervisorReal-time computingDeep learningAssisted livingTerm (time)Artificial intelligenceRemote patient monitoringSimulationComputer visionMedicineTelecommunicationsNursing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We propose a radar-based system for wellness monitoring for long-term care (LTC) facilities. Three standalone systems are used to monitor a resident in the washroom, living room and bed. A novel resident detection algorithm is proposed to find the occupied room. Based on the outcome of the algorithm, the resident's washroom frequency, washroom usage time, and location can be recorded. For the resident in the living room area, gait analysis, activity recognition, and vital sign monitoring are performed using sequential deep learning models. Additionally, the sequential deep learning model identifies fall incidents and fall recovery. In the case of a non-recovered fall, an alert is sent to a caregiver or supervisor. The experimental results obtained from a local LTC are highly accurate, demonstrating the effectiveness of radar-based sensors for LTC facilities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.098
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it