MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

HPIPE NX: Boosting CNN Inference Acceleration Performance with AI-Optimized FPGAs

2022· article· en· W4311839757 on OpenAlexaff
Marius N. Stan, Mathew Hall, Mohamed Ibrahim, Vaughn Betz

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Neural Network Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceField-programmable gate arrayStratixParallel computingConvolutional neural networkComputer architectureAdderCompilerApplication-specific integrated circuitGate arrayEmbedded systemComputer hardwareComputer engineeringArtificial intelligenceLatency (audio)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With the ever-increasing compute demands of artificial intelligence (AI) workloads, there is extensive interest in leveraging field-programmable gate-arrays (FPGAs) to quickly deploy hardware accelerators for the latest convolutional neural networks (CNNs). Recent FPGA architectures are also evolving to better serve the needs of AI, but accelerators need extensive re-design to leverage these new features. The Stratix 10 NX chip by Intel is a new FPGA that replaces traditional DSP blocks with in-fabric AI tensor blocks that provide 15x more multipliers and up to 143 TOPS of performance, at the cost of lower precision (INT8) and significant restrictions on how many operands can be fed to the multipliers from the programmable routing. In this paper, we explore different CNN accelerator structures to leverage the tensor blocks, considering the various tensor block modes, operand bandwidth restrictions, and on-chip memory restrictions. We incorporate the most performant techniques into HPIPE, a layer-pipelined and sparse-aware CNN accelerator for FPGAs. We enhance HPIPE's software compiler to restructure the CNN computations and on-chip memory layout to take advantage of the additional multipliers offered by the new tensor block architecture, while also avoiding stalls due to data loading restrictions. We achieve cycle-by-cycle speedups in tensor mode of up to$\mathbf{8}.\mathbf{3}\mathbf{x}$for Mobilenet-v1 versus the original HPIPE design using conventional DSPs. On the FPGA, we achieve a throughput of 28,541 and 29,429 images/s on Mobilenet-v1 and Mobilenet-v2 respectively, outperforming all previous FPGA accelerators by at least 4.0x, including one on an AI-optimized Xilinx chip. We also outperform NVIDIA's V100 GPU, a machine learning targeted GPU on a similar process node with a$\mathbf{1}.\mathbf{7}\mathbf{x}$larger die size, by up to 17x with a batch size of one and 1.3x with NVIDIA's largest reported batch size of 128.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Neural Network ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207