MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4311880559 · doi:10.1107/s2053273322010944

Revisited relativistic Dirac–Hartree–Fock X-ray scattering factors. I. Neutral atoms with <i>Z</i> = 2–118

2022· article· en· W4311880559 on OpenAlexaff
Shiroye Olukayode, Charlotte Froese Fischer, Anatoliy Volkov

Bibliographic record

VenueActa Crystallographica Section A Foundations and Advances · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Chemical Physics Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWave functionAtomic physicsPhysicsScatteringRelativistic quantum chemistryHartree–Fock methodAtomic orbitalQuantum mechanicsChemistryElectron

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this first of a series of publications, the X-ray scattering factors for neutral atoms are revisited. Using the recently developed DBSR_HF program [Zatsarinny & Froese Fischer (2016). Comput. Phys. Comm. 202 , 287–303] the fully relativistic Dirac–Hartree–Fock ground-state wavefunctions for all atoms with Z = 2–118 (He–Og) have been calculated using the extended average level scheme and including both the Breit interaction correction to the electronic motion due to magnetic and retardation effects, and the Fermi distribution function for the description of the nuclear charge density. The comparison of our wavefunctions with those obtained in several previous studies in terms of the total and orbital (spinor) electronic energies, and a number of local and integrated total and orbital properties, confirmed the quality of the generated wavefunctions. The employed dense radial grid combined with the DBSR_HF 's B-spline representation of the relativistic one-electron orbitals allowed for a precise integration of the X-ray scattering factors using a newly developed Fortran program SF . Following the established procedure [Maslen et al. (2006). International Tables for Crystallography , Vol. C, Section 6.1.1, pp. 554–589], the resulting X-ray scattering factors have been interpolated in the 0 ≤ sin θ/λ ≤ 2 Å −1 and 2 ≤ sin θ/λ ≤ 6 Å −1 ranges using the recommended analytical functions with both the four- (which is a current convention) and five-term expansions. An exhaustive comparison of the newly generated X-ray scattering factors with the International Union of Crystallography recommended values and those from a number of previous studies showed an overall good agreement and allowed identification of a number of typos and inconsistencies in the recommended quantities. A detailed analysis of the results suggests that the newly derived values may represent an excellent compromise among all the previous studies. The determined conventional interpolating functions for the two sin θ/λ intervals show, on average, the same accuracy as the recommended parametrizations. However, an extension of each expansion by only a single term provides a significant improvement in the accuracy of the interpolated values for an overwhelming majority of the atoms. As such, an updated set of the fully relativistic X-ray scattering factors and the interpolating functions for neutral atoms with Z = 2–118 can be easily incorporated into the existing X-ray diffraction software with only minor modifications. The outcomes of the undertaken research should be of interest to members of the crystallographic community who push the boundaries of the accuracy and precision of X-ray diffraction studies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueActa Crystallographica Section A Foundations and AdvancesSame topicAdvanced Chemical Physics StudiesFrench-language works237,207