Multi-step forecast of PM2.5 and PM10 concentrations using convolutional neural network integrated with spatial–temporal attention and residual learning
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Accurate and reliable forecasting of PM2.5 and PM10 concentrations is important to the public to reasonably avoid air pollution and for the governmental policy responses. However, the prediction of PM2.5 and PM10 concentrations has great uncertainty and instability because of the dynamics of atmospheric flows, making it difficult for a single model to efficiently extract the spatial–temporal dependences. This paper reports a robust forecasting system to achieve accurate multi-step ahead forecasting of PM2.5 and PM10 concentrations. First, correlation analysis is adopted to screen the spatial information on pollution and meteorology that may facilitate the prediction of concentrations in a target city. Then, a spatial–temporal attention mechanism is used to assign weights to original inputs from both space and time dimensions to enhance the essential information. Subsequently, the residual-based convolutional neural network with feature extraction capabilities is employed to model the refined inputs. Finally, five accuracy metrics and two additional statistical tests are applied to comprehensively assess the performance of the proposed forecasting system. In addition, experimental studies of three major cities in the Yangtze River Delta urban agglomeration region indicate that the forecasting system outperforms various prevalent baseline models in terms of accuracy and stability. Quantitatively, the proposed STA-ResCNN model reduces root mean square error by 5.595 %-15.247 % and 6.827 %-16.906 % for the average of 1–4 h ahead predictions in three major cities of PM2.5 and PM10, respectively, compared to baseline models. The applicability and generalization of the proposed forecasting system are further verified by the extended applications in the other 23 cities in the entire region. The results prove that the forecasting system is promising in the early warning, regional prevention, and control of air pollution.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".