Toward Smart-Building Digital Twins: BIM and IoT Data Integration
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Smart-building digital twins aim to virtually replicate the static and dynamic building characteristics through real-time connectivity between the virtual and physical counterparts. The virtual replica of the building can then be leveraged to monitor the current state, predict the future state, and take proactive measures to ensure optimal operation. Despite its potential, smart-building digital twin research is at an early stage compared to manufacturing and aerospace fields. One of the major impediments to adopting digital twin technology in smart buildings is the lack of interoperability, primarily between Building Information Modeling (BIM) and Internet of Things (IoT) data sources. Consequently, this paper presents a novel multi-layer digital twin architecture for smart buildings called BIM-IoT Data Integration (BIM-IoTDI) to enable semantic interoperability among smart-building digital twin applications. A detailed framework is presented based on the newly developed architecture, introducing an ontology-based query mediation method that provides integrated data access. An experimental evaluation model is developed to characterize the feasibility of the BIM-IoTDI architecture and framework. Furthermore, the performance of the new query mediation method is evaluated and compared to an existing BIM-IoT data integration approach. According to the evaluation results, the BIM-IoTDI architecture and framework are better suited to supporting the envisioned smart-building digital twin capabilities.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.011 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".