Reinforcement Learning-Based Optimization Framework for Application Component Migration in NFV Cloud-Fog Environments
Bibliographic record
Abstract
By decoupling network functions from the underlying hardware, Network Function Virtualization (NFV) allows application components to be implemented as sets of Virtual Network Functions (VNFs) chained in a specific order, represented by VNF-Forwarding Graphs (VNF-FG). Fog computing is instrumental to tap into the full potential of NFV by deploying VNFs in close proximity to end-users, thus decreasing the latency significantly. However, the mobility of end-users and the fog nodes, and the limited fog nodes coverage results in service discontinuity and may increase application delay. Application component migration offers great potential to address this issue. In this paper, we propose a component migration strategy in an NFV-based hybrid cloud/fog system considering the mobility of both end-users and fog nodes. We use the Gauss-Markov mobility model and a random walk mobility model for fog nodes and end-user devices, respectively. We modeled the problem mathematically, which minimizes the aggregated weighted function of application delay and cost. However, considering the mobility of both end-users and fog nodes makes the problem quite complex. Hence, we propose a Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) approach to decide where and when to migrate application components and to achieve rapid decision-making. Simulation results demonstrate that the proposed scheme performs well. It offers favorable convergence and outperforms existing algorithms in terms of application delay and migration costs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".