Estonian Language. Second Edition. Linguistica Uralica. Supplementary Series 1, Tallinn 2007
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Estonian language belongs to the Finnic group of the Finno-Ugric lanÂguage family. Today there are about 1.1 million native speakers of Estonian. Most of them (about 0.94 million) live in the Republic of Estonia, the rest (about 0.16 million) are scattered outside Estonia, with larger communities in Russia, the USA, Canada, and Sweden. The Estonian language developed on the basis of the converging tribal dialects (or languages) that were spoken in the Estonian area - the North Estonian dialect or the Maa dialect and the South Estonian dialect or the Ugala dialect - possibly in the 13th-16thcenturies. Standard Estonian started to develop in the 16th century. However, due to dialect differences at first Standard Estonian was not uniform but had two standard varieties - North Estonian or the Tallinn language and South Estonian or the Tartu language. Gradually Standard North Estonian started to predominate in the 18th century, especially after the publication of the North Estonian Bible in 1739. It gained the final victory over Standard South Estonian during the period of national awakening in the second half of the 19th century. The common standard lanÂguage gave rise to the common spoken variety of educated Estonians and later the entire Estonian nation; the local dialects started to decline. The standard language became uniform by means of the language reÂforms of the early 20th century. These reforms made it possible to use EstoÂnian in all of its functions, including the language of science and higher education. Estonian was the official language ofthe Republic of Estonia in 1919-1940 and regained this status once again in 1988. Its use is regulated by the Language Law. Typologically Estonian is an agglutinating language but more fusional and analytic than the languages belonging to the northern branch of the Finnic languages. Estonian has been influenced by a number of languages, in the early period of the standard language especially by German but later also by Finnish and Russian. English is a major influence for the present-day usage. The first descriptions of the Estonian language were published as early as in the 17th century. However, the scientific research of Estonian started at the beginning of the 19th century. The year 1803 witnessed the beginning of teachÂing the Estonian language at the University of Tartu. National research into Estonian began at the end of the 19th century, during the period of national awakening. The first Estonian-language descriptions of Estonian were pubÂlished during this period. More purposeful and fruitful research into Estonian developed after the professorship of the Estonian language was set up at the University of Tartu in 1919. There are very few general surveys of the Estonian language for the international reader, and the existing ones were published a long time ago. The most recent and the best one is Introduction to Estonian Linguistics by Alo Raun and Andrus Saareste (Ural-Altaische Bibliothek XII. Wiesbaden, 1965). The present volume attempts to fill this gap and to provide a comprehensive account of the Estonian language to the international reader - its structure, origin and development, standard language, dialects, spoken language, and the study of Estonian. The authors include Tiit-Rein Viitso, Professor of Finnic languages; Karl Pajusalu, Professor of History and Dialects of the Estonian Language; Mati Erelt, Professor of the Estonian Language (all three work at the University of Tartu); Tiiu Erelt, Senior Researcher at the Institute of the Estonian Language; Heli Laanekask, Lecturer in Estonian at the University of Oulu, and Leelo Keevallik, Researcher at the University of Uppsala. Enn Veldi, Associate Professor at the University of Tartu, made a significant conÂtribution to this volume by translating a large part of the text into English. Mai Tiits, Researcher at the Institute of the Estonian Language, prepared the manuscript for publication. The writing and publication of this book was generously funded by the Estonian Ministry of Education and Research. The publication was additionÂally funded by the Faculty of Philosophy of the University of Tartu and the Department of English of Tallinn Pedagogical University.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.010 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.194 | 0.132 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".