SetRkNN: Efficient and Privacy-Preserving Set Reverse kNN Query in Cloud
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The advance of cloud computing has driven a new paradigm of outsourcing large-scale data and data-driven services to public clouds. Due to the increased awareness of privacy protection, many studies have focused on addressing security and privacy issues in outsourced query services. Although many privacy-preserving schemes have been proposed for various query types, the set reverse k nearest neighbors (RkNN) query is still an unexplored area. Even if some existing schemes can be adapted to achieve privacy-preserving set RkNN queries, they will suffer from linear search efficiency. As a steppingstone, in this paper, we propose an efficient and privacy-preserving set RkNN query scheme over encrypted data with sublinear query efficiency. Specifically, we first design an inverted prefix index to organize the set dataset and propose an algorithm to traverse the index with sublinear search efficiency. Then, we propose two oblivious data comparison protocols based on a symmetric homomorphic encryption (SHE) scheme and design the private filter/refinement protocols to preserve the privacy of index searching. After that, we propose an access pattern privacy-preserving set RkNN query scheme by using private filter/refinement protocols. Rigorous security analysis demonstrates that our scheme can protect data privacy and access pattern privacy. Experimental results indicate that our scheme is more efficient than the available naive solution in terms of computational costs and communication overheads.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".