Workload-aware Dynamic GPU Resource Management in Component-based Applications
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In edge and cloud environments, using graphics processing units (GPUs) as a high-speed parallel computing device increases the performance of compute-intensive applications. Nowadays, due to the increase in the volume and complexity of data to be processed, GPUs are more actively used in component-based applications. As a result, the sequence of multiple interdependent components is co-located on the GPU and shares GPU resources. The overall application performance in this kind of application depends on the data transfer overhead and the performance of each component in the sequence. Managing the components' competitive use of shared GPU resources faces various challenges. The lack of a low-overhead and online technique for dynamic GPU resource allocation leads to imbalanced GPU usage and penalizes the overall performance. In this paper, we present efficient GPU memory and resource managers that improve overall system performance by using shared memory and dynamically assigning portions of shared GPU resources. The portions are based on the components' workload and throughput-based performance analyzer while guaranteeing the application's progress. The evaluation results show that our dynamic resource allocation method is able to improve the average performance of the applications with the various number of concurrent components by up to 29.81% over the default GPU concurrent multitasking. We also show that using shared memory results in 2x performance improvements.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it