MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4312617070 · doi:10.1109/tdsc.2022.3227650

Multi-Client Boolean File Retrieval With Adaptable Authorization Switching for Secure Cloud Search Services

2022· article· en· W4312617070 on OpenAlexaff
Kai Zhang, Xiwen Wang, Jianting Ning, Mi Wen, Rongxing Lu

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCryptography and Data Security
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
FundersProgram of Shanghai Academic Research LeaderShanghai Rising-Star ProgramNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsComputer scienceEncryptionCloud computingCloud storageInitializationDatabaseTheoretical computer scienceOperating systemProgramming language

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Secure cloud search services provide a cost-effective way for resource-constrained clients to search encrypted files in the cloud, where data owners can customize search authorization. Despite providing fine-grained authorization, traditional attribute-based keyword search (ABKS) solutions generally support single keyword search. Towards expressive queries over encrypted data, multi-client searchable symmetric encryption (MC-SSE) was introduced. However, current search authorizations of existing MC-SSEs: (i) cannot support dynamic updating; (ii) are (semi-)black-box implementations of attribute-based encryption; (iii) incur significant cost during system initialization and file encryption. To address these limitations, we present AasBirch, an MC-SSE system with fast fine-grained authorization that supports adaptable authorization switching from one policy to any other one. AasBirch achieves constant-size storage and lightweight time cost for system initialization, file encryption and file searching. We conduct extensive experiments based on Enron dataset in real cloud environment. Compared to state-of-the-art MC-SSE with fine-grained authorization, AasBirch achieves 30$\sim 200\times$smaller public parameter and secret key size, with the assumed least frequent keyword in a query ($s$-term) as 21. Moreover, it runs 10$\sim 20\times$faster for file encryption and$>20\times$faster for file searching. In addition, AasBirch outperforms 80,000× (resp. 7,850×) faster with$s$-term=1 (resp. =21), as compared to classic dynamic ABKS system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.029

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.005
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure ComputingSame topicCryptography and Data SecurityFrench-language works237,207