MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4312631270 · doi:10.5004/dwt.2022.28636

Assessment of the innovative freezing-melting technology for desalination of the Mediterranean seawater in the Gaza Strip, Palestine

2022· article· en· W4312631270 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueDesalination and Water Treatment · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFreezing and Crystallization Processes
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPalestineDesalinationGaza stripSeawaterMediterranean climateMediterranean seaEnvironmental scienceOceanographyGeologyGeographyChemistryAncient historyArchaeologyHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Although the freezing-melting process is not widely used commercially, perhaps the most significant potential advantage of desalination by freezing is the very low energy required compared with other desalination processes. Five seawater samples of 3,000 mL each were collected from different locations at the Gaza Strip beach. The physicochemical characteristics of the raw seawater samples were tested. The seawater samples were poured into an identical flask connected directly to an external stainless steel single-phase freezer (thermally protected-Sichuan Dandy Co. Ltd. 220 Volt, 50 Hz) with an energy consumption of 0.1 kW/h to be crystallized by direct freezing (at −20°C). Then the physicochemical analysis was undertaken on the water produced from three repeated freezing- melting (FM) cycles for each seawater sample. The average water mineral reduction percentages ranged from 39.0% to 45.5%, (49.7%–52.8%), and (56.0%–59.0%) for the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd FM cycles, respectively. The overall average removal percentage of dissolved minerals and constituents after the 3rd FM cycle for North Gaza, Gaza, Middle area, Khan Younis, and Rafah seawater samples was 84.7%, 85.6%, 87.3%, 86.4%, and 87.6%, respectively. The time of crystallization in the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd freezing cycles was 80, 50, and 30 min, respectively. The consumed energy for produced water after the three cycles of freezing was 0.018, 0.022, 0.018, 0.023, and 0.021 kW/L for the North Gaza, Gaza, Middle Area, Khan Younis, and Rafah seawater samples, respectively. The FM technique could be used as a pretreatment method for other methods of desalination.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.468
Threshold uncertainty score0.178

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it