MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4312688152 · doi:10.1016/j.ifacol.2022.10.175

A Vehicle Routing Problem with Time Windows and Workload Balancing for COVID-19 Testers: A Case Study

2022· article· en· W4312688152 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIFAC-PapersOnLine · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicVehicle Routing Optimization Methods
Canadian institutionsHEC Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWorkloadSolverComputer scienceVehicle routing problemInteger programmingCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Routing (electronic design automation)Operations researchEngineeringEmbedded systemOperating systemAlgorithmMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, laboratories have faced unprecedented demand for in-home delivery test services. This drastic demand increase requires a rapid reaction from laboratories to manage their testers in order to respond to the high demand volume and avoid unnecessary costs. This study provides an optimization model based on the vehicle routing problem with time windows by considering the testers' workload balancing to improve laboratories' assignment and routing policies. A medical lab that has faced this situation for its in-home test services is taken as a real-world case in the current study. A mixed-integer programming model is solved for small instances using the CPLEX solver, and an adaptive large neighborhood search algorithm is implemented for large instances. Ultimately, the obtained solutions are compared to the real-world implementation of the lab on a dataset of six consecutive days, and the results are further discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.414
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it