MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4312733588 · doi:10.1016/j.ifacol.2022.10.217

Machine Learning Models for Efficient Port Terminal Operations: Case of Vessels’ Arrival Times Prediction

2022· article· en· W4312733588 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIFAC-PapersOnLine · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMaritime Ports and Logistics
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Rimouski
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPort (circuit theory)Terminal (telecommunication)Computer scienceWork (physics)Supply chainOperations researchArtificial intelligenceEngineeringComputer network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Port terminals are critical nodes in the maritime transport network and play a significant role in the global supply chain. However, they still suffer from many disruptions entailed by their complex environment leading to many challenges. With the maritime digital transformation, ports and ships produce significant amounts of data offering an opportunity to use Machine Learning techniques to address some issues and support port terminal operations management. This paper addresses the problem of vessel arrival times prediction to destination ports using Machine Learning models and vessels’ historical trajectories data. This paper also provides a structured overview of research work concerning the contribution of Machine Learning techniques in handling port terminal concerns. The existing literature shows that related work has tackled different problems, but further development is needed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.228
Threshold uncertainty score0.591

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it