MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4312841610 · doi:10.1109/iotm.001.2100130

Evolution and Trends in Artificial Intelligence of Things Security: When Good Enough is Not Good Enough!

2022· article· en· W4312841610 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Internet of Things Magazine · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNetwork Security and Intrusion Detection
Canadian institutionsUniversity of OttawaRoyal Military College of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer securityComputer scienceScope (computer science)CountermeasureInternet of ThingsGovernment (linguistics)Cloud computing securityBig dataCloud computingEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Artificial Intelligence of Things (AIoT) combines the power of artificial intelligence, computing power, and IoT infrastructure. With AIoT, artificial intelligence (AI) is embedded in computing devices, all connected to one or more IoT networks. The mutual benefit of these two technologies allows for a different vision and a broader scope of action. It will enable the analysis of Big Data, make decisions and act on data without human intervention. Although there have been gradual advancements in IoT Security, most connected machines and devices have been built with security in mind as a second thought, where the basic minimum standards are “good enough.” However, given the increasing importance of data security in today's world, providing additional layers of security at the network and device level is paramount, especially for critical applications such as government, defense, and healthcare. This paper will provide the current and future security techniques to countermeasure the cybersecurity threats facing the IoT and AIoT.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.671
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it