MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

An Accident Identification and Alerting System by Using Raspberry Pi

2022· article· en· W4312900765 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venue2022 IEEE 2nd Mysore Sub Section International Conference (MysuruCon) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIoT-based Smart Home Systems
Canadian institutionsHorizon College and Seminary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRaspberry piIdentification (biology)Computer scienceAccident (philosophy)Computer securityInternet of ThingsBotany

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

When an accident occurs, the time it takes for an emergency medical facility to be established and operational has a significant impact on a victim’s survival. Reduce the time it takes for an accident scene to be examined by a medical professional to reduce the death rate. Emergency responders can be alerted to a disaster by using a Raspberry Pi-based accident identification system. This helps to shorten response times. Vibration sensors detect errors and then send a prepared message to the right people. It’s important to know what happened and who was involved in an accident in order to send the appropriate information to emergency responders. It is possible to get accurate longitude and latitude positions for satellites if the first GPS is used in this manner. To get the GSM device to start following the car, you must send it a message. The Raspberry Pi controller’s vibration sensor can also be used to identify the error. A pre-programmed emergency server receives every GSM emergency call, no matter where the caller is located.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.886
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it