Classification-based Multi-task Learning for Efficient Pose Estimation Network
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Human pose estimation is an interesting and underlying topic in various fields such as action recognition and human-computer interaction. Although many methods have been developed recently, they are still far from perfect in accuracy and speed at a time. In this paper, we propose a Classification-based Pose Estimation Network with Multi-task Learning (CPENML) based on the low-resolution feature map to improve accuracy and inference time simultaneously. The proposed CPENML consists of two ideas. Firstly, novel proposed keypoint and offset estimation tasks based on classification achieve better performance than regression. Secondly, the proposed Multi-Scale Network (MSN) makes robust feature maps and balances the keypoint and offset tasks to maximize performance. To prove the effectiveness of the proposed method, we conduct ablation studies on the COCO dataset for proposed ideas. Compared to benchmarks, we demonstrate the superiority of our proposed method on COCO dataset in terms of inference time and accuracy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it