Automatic Detection of Congestive Heart Failure Based on Multiscale Residual UNet++: From Centralized Learning to Federated Learning
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Congestive heart failure (CHF) is a progressive and complex syndrome resulted from ventricular dysfunction, which is difficult to detect at early stages. Heart rate variability (HRV) has been identified as a prognostic indicator for CHF. The traditional diagnosis methods based on analyzing the electrocardiogram (ECG) are time-consuming and laborious, and the interpretation of the results is subjective. Inspired by the outstanding performance of U-shaped networks in medical image segmentation, in this article, we propose a novel end-to-end classification model based on 2000 intervals between successive R-peaks of ECG signals. The proposed model integrates the outputs of encoders, decoders, and intermediate units through a unified scale operation, which can not only preserve low-level details from the input signals but also extract the high-level pathology-related information. We further employ a variant of residual module with group convolution and squeeze-and-excitation (SE) block, enhancing the network’s expression capability. In addition, considering the challenge of collecting large and diverse samples by individual institutions, we decentralize the data across different clients and extend the proposed model with a federated version, which is able to facilitate multi-institutional collaborations while maintaining data anonymity. A total of 29 CHF patients and 177 non-CHF subjects (i.e., 54 normal sinus rhythm (NSR) subjects, 84 atrial fibrillation (AF), and 39 Apnea subjects) from PhysioBank are included in this article. The experimental results show that the proposed model outperforms the state of the art both in centralized and decentralized learning, with an accuracy of 89.83% and 87.54%, respectively. The diagnosis model trained in federated framework provides competitive performance to that in centralized learning, which demonstrates its potential of utilizing multisite data to improve CHF detection performance without sharing patient privacy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".