Shear strengthening of concrete T-beams with lateral layers of UHPC
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Concrete T-beams are commonly used in building slab systems and bridge decks. They may require strengthening in shear when they are deteriorated or when loading requirements increased. This research project studied the shear behaviour of concrete T-beams using cast-in-place Ultra High-Performance Concrete (UHPC) layers as a lateral strengthening method avoiding beam depth modification. Three UHPC strengthened beams together with one reference reinforced concrete beam were tested in monotonic three-point bending. Parameters investigated include the thickness of UHPC layers and the presence of steel anchors at the UHPC-concrete interface. A digital image correlation (DIC) technique was used to investigate the strain distribution of T-beams during the testing. Strain distribution, failure modes and strengthening effects provided by the UHPC lateral strengthening were analyzed. Results show that UHPC strengthening can substantially improve the stiffness and shear capacity of concrete T-beams, 25 and 50 mm lateral layers increased by 102% and 113% the T-beam shear capacity, respectively. Typical bending-shear behaviour were observed on each strengthened beam with UHPC layers. A final shear failure was observed in the T-beam with 25 mm UHPC layers and 50 mm UHPC layers without anchors, while a combination of shear and bending failure was noted in the T-beam with 50 mm UHPC layers and steel anchors. The steel anchors at the UHPC-concrete interface can further increase the ultimate shear capacity and beam stiffness, but at a limited extent. Therefore, experimental results confirmed that cast-in-place UHPC lateral layers are an effective way to strengthen existing concrete T-beams with inadequate shear capacity
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it