Imbalanced Multimodal Attention-Based System for Multiclass House Price Prediction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
House price prediction is an important problem for individuals, companies, organizations, and governments. With a vast amount of diversified and multimodal data available about houses, the predictive models built should seek to make the best use of these data. This leads to the complex problem of how to effectively use multimodal data for house price prediction. Moreover, this is also a context suffering from class imbalance, an issue that cannot be disregarded. In this paper, we propose a new algorithm for addressing these problems: the imbalanced multimodal attention-based system (IMAS). The IMAS makes use of an oversampling strategy that operates on multimodal data, namely using text, numeric, categorical, and boolean data types. A self-attention mechanism is embedded to leverage the usage of neighboring information that can benefit the model’s performance. Moreover, the self-attention mechanism allows for the determination of the features that are the most relevant and adapts the weights used according to that information when performing inference. Our experimental results show the clear advantage of the IMAS, which outperforms all the competitors tested. The analysis of the weights obtained through the self-attention mechanism provides insights into the features’ relevance and also supports the importance of using this mechanism in the predictive model.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".