MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Implementation of Smart Vehicle Accident Detection using Raspberry PI in Smart Cities

2022· article· en· W4313270307 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venue2022 4th International Conference on Inventive Research in Computing Applications (ICIRCA) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIoT and GPS-based Vehicle Safety Systems
Canadian institutionsHorizon College and Seminary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRaspberry piGlobal Positioning SystemGeographic coordinate systemGSMComputer scienceReal-time computingComputer securityAccident (philosophy)Emergency vehicleEmbedded systemTelecommunicationsInternet of ThingsGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article shows that when an accident occurs, the time it takes for an emergency medical facility to be established and put into operation has a significant influence on the survival of the victim. Reducing accident scene time is considered by medical professionals to reduce mortality. Emergency responders can be alerted to disasters using the Raspberry Pi-based accident identification system. This helps to shorten response times. The vibration sensor detects the error and then sends the prepared message to the right person. It is important to know what happened and who was involved in an accident in order to send appropriate information to emergency responders. It is possible to get precise latitude and longitude positions for satellites if GPS is first used in this way. In order for the GSM device to start tracking the vehicle, need to send a message to it. The Raspberry Pi controller's vibration sensor can also be used to identify faults.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.636
Threshold uncertainty score0.781

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.128
GPT teacher head0.401
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it