MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4313306425 · doi:10.1109/lcomm.2022.3233524

Outage Probability Analysis of LR-FHSS in Satellite IoT Networks

2022· article· en· W4313306425 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Communications Letters · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIoT Networks and Protocols
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsSpread spectrumFrequency-hopping spread spectrumChirp spread spectrumComputer scienceAlohaLPWANComputer networkFadingCommunications satelliteNakagami distributionRange (aeronautics)Channel (broadcasting)TelecommunicationsWirelessSatelliteThroughputDirect-sequence spread spectrumEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Long-range frequency-hopping spread spectrum (LR-FHSS) is a promising solution for long-range and dense deployment of Internet of Things (IoT) networks since it can provide a significant capacity improvement compared to the conventional Aloha-based chirp spread spectrum (CSS). In this letter, we present an analytical approach for deriving the outage probability of LR-FHSS in a satellite-based IoT network taking into account the noise, channel fading impairments, and more importantly, the capture effect. The obtained analytical expressions are validated with computer simulations and show that for a typical target outage probability of 10−2, exploiting LR-FHSS in the considered system model can serve up to 60, 000 and 120, 000 end devices per hour for 48 bytes of information using two specified data rates in the North America region. These numbers present significant capacity increases over the conventional low-power long-range (LoRa) network.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.047
Threshold uncertainty score0.500

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it