MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4313377891 · doi:10.3934/math.2023177

Some novel existence and uniqueness results for the Hilfer fractional integro-differential equations with non-instantaneous impulsive multi-point boundary conditions and their application

2022· article· en· W4313377891 on OpenAlexaff
Thabet Abdeljawad, Pshtiwan Othman Mohammed, H. M. Srivastava, Eman Al-Sarairah, Artion Kashuri, Kamsing Nonlaopon

Bibliographic record

VenueAIMS Mathematics · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicNonlinear Differential Equations Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUniquenessMathematicsMathematical analysisFixed-point theoremFractional calculusBoundary value problemNonlinear systemConsistency (knowledge bases)Applied mathematicsDiscrete mathematicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this article, we discuss conditions that are sufficient for the existence of solutions for some $ {\psi} $-Hilfer fractional integro-differential equations with non-instantaneous impulsive multi-point boundary conditions. By applying Krasnoselskii's and Banach's fixed point theorems, we investigate the existence and uniqueness of these solutions. Moreover, we have proved its boundedness of the method. We extend some earlier results by introducing and including the $ {\psi} $-Hilfer fractional derivative, nonlinear integral terms and non-instantaneous impulsive conditions. Finally, we offer an application to explain the consistency of our theoretical results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAIMS MathematicsSame topicNonlinear Differential Equations AnalysisFrench-language works237,207