Histories of emotion in Communist and post-Communist Europe after 1945
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
What can we learn about the recent history of central and eastern Europe by focusing on the theme of emotions? Conversely, how can the history of emotions benefit from contemporary historical work on these specific world regions? Opening a special section that sheds light on these questions, this introduction outlines the research field of emotion history and discusses pertinent studies on central and eastern Europe since 1945. To prevent emotion from becoming a catch-all concept, the introduction argues for a distinctive understanding of feelings that takes into account the dimensions of the body and the senses. It also shows that the history of emotion forces us to confront binary historiographical patterns of thought (nature vs. culture, inside vs. outside, feeling vs. expression of feeling). With regard to the analysis of state socialism, the revolutions of 1989–91, and the transition to a post-socialist order, the introduction argues that emotional dynamics should not be deterministically derived from political and economic processes, but rather that “emotion” should be understood as a category of analysis in its own right.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it