A Systematic Approach to Adaptive Mesh Refinement for Computational Electrodynamics
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
There is a great need to solve CED problems on adaptive meshes; referred to here as AMR-CED. The problem was deemed to be susceptible to “long-term instability” and parameterized methods have been used to control the instability. In this paper, we present a new class of AMR-CED methods that are free of this instability because they are based on a more careful understanding of the constraints in Maxwell's equations and their preservation on a single control volume. The important building blocks of these new methods are: 1) Timestep sub-cycling of finer child meshes relative to parent meshes. 2) Restriction of fine mesh facial data to coarser meshes when the two meshes are synchronized in time. 3) Divergence constraint-preserving prolongation of the coarse mesh solution to newly built fine meshes or to the ghost zones of pre-existing fine meshes. 4) Electric and magnetic field intensity-correction strategy at fine-coarse interfaces. Using examples, we show that the resulting AMR-CED algorithm is free of “long-term instability”. Unlike previous methods, there are no adjustable parameters. The method is inherently stable because a strict algorithmic consistency is applied at all levels in the AMR mesh hierarchy. We also show that the method preserves order of accuracy, so that high order methods for AMR-CED are indeed possible.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it