MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4313897847 · doi:10.1016/j.measen.2023.100670

An effective technique to schedule priority aware tasks to offload data on edge and cloud servers

2023· article· en· W4313897847 on OpenAlexaff
Malvinder Singh Bali, Kamali Gupta, Deepali Gupta, Gautam Srivastava, Ali Nauman

Bibliographic record

VenueMeasurement Sensors · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicIoT and Edge/Fog Computing
Canadian institutionsBrandon University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceCloud computingServerEdge computingScheduling (production processes)Distributed computingScheduleQuality of serviceResponse timeEnhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionEdge deviceComputer networkOperating systemArtificial intelligenceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recent advancements in the Internet of Things (IoT) have enhanced the quality of life globally. Billions of devices are brought under the ambit of IoT to make them smarter. IoT-based applications are generating voluminous data and managing this widespread amount of data in real-time through Cloud Technology, which offers high computational and storage facilities. However, sending all data to the cloud can bring serious concerns for applications, which are critical and require instant action without any delay. Edge computing has recently emerged as an effective technology to handle the instant processing of tasks of IoT-based applications locally. Additionally, an important concern in IoT networks is response to emergency tasks on time to increase the performance of large-scale IoT systems. As such, scheduling of tasks becomes vital, where emergency and non-emergency tasks can be prioritized to offload data to the nearby edge and cloud servers respectively and enhance Quality of Service (QoS). The execution order of tasks and allocating resources for computation to avoid delays are two of the most important factors that must be addressed during task scheduling in Edge Computing. With the aforementioned issues, we design a Priority aware Task Scheduling (PaTS) algorithm for sensor networks to schedule priority aware tasks to offload data on edge and cloud servers. The problem is formulated as a multi-objective function and the efficiency of the proposed algorithm is evaluated using the Bio-inspired NSGA-2 technique. The overall improvement for average queue delay, computation time, and energy obtained for 200 tasks is 17.2%, 7.08% and 11.4%, respectively. The results obtained show significant improvement when compared with the benchmark algorithms demonstrating the effectiveness of the proposed solution. Similarly, comparative results for tasks when increased from 200 to 1000 tasks also shows subsequent improvements.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMeasurement SensorsSame topicIoT and Edge/Fog ComputingFrench-language works237,207