MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4314946009 · doi:10.1109/cdc51059.2022.9992446

Disturbance Observer and Depth Enhanced Visual-Inertial Navigation System For Multi-rotor MAVs: An Observability Analysis

2022· article· en· W4314946009 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venue2022 IEEE 61st Conference on Decision and Control (CDC) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRobotics and Sensor-Based Localization
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council CanadaMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersNational Research Council
KeywordsObservabilityControl theory (sociology)DragFilter (signal processing)Computer scienceState observerObserver (physics)Disturbance (geology)Inertial frame of referenceNonlinear systemSimulationComputer visionEngineeringArtificial intelligenceMathematicsPhysicsAerospace engineeringGeologyControl (management)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper proposes a new filtering-based depth enhanced visual internal navigation system (DE-VINS) with external disturbance observation. This filter resolves the drifting and degraded performance of drag force model VINS filters at hovering conditions and during the existence of external disturbances. A theoretical nonlinear observability analysis is performed to verify the filter design. The performance of the proposed DE-VINS is investigated through two sets of numerical simulations using a Matlab simulator and compared against the state-of-the-art drag force VINS filters. The results show improved performance of the DE-VINS in terms of estimation accuracy and consistency at zero-velocity flight (hovering) during the existence of external disturbances while estimating the magnitude and direction of the disturbance force.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.433
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it