MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4315471858 · doi:10.1109/cdc51059.2022.9992534

Robust State Estimation of Nonlinear Systems Using High-Gain Transmissibility

2022· article· en· W4315471858 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venue2022 IEEE 61st Conference on Decision and Control (CDC) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFault Detection and Control Systems
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransmissibility (structural dynamics)Robustness (evolution)Control theory (sociology)Nonlinear systemEstimatorComputer scienceHigh-gain antennaMathematicsMathematical optimizationEngineeringArtificial intelligenceStatisticsPhysicsVibration

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Transmissibility operators are mathematical relations that connect unknown system outputs. In previous work, transmissibility operators showed robustness against unknown nonlinear system dynamics. Inspired by the high-gain observers, this paper extends transmissibility operators to the form of high-gain transmissibility. High-gain transmissibility is then used for the robust estimation of the system states. No direct measurements of the system states are available. The system model in this work can follow any non-canonical form. We show that the high-gain transmissibility estimator is able to robustly estimate the system states in the presence of unknown system nonlinearities that affect all states, and part of the output measurement is corrupted by noise. The potential of the proposed estimator is demonstrated through a simulation example.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.363
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it