MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Age-oriented Access Control in GEO/LEO Heterogeneous Network for Marine IoRT

2022· article· en· W4315605992 on OpenAlexaff
Yi Cai, Shaohua Wu, Jiping Luo, Jian Jiao, Ning Zhang, Qinyu Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueGLOBECOM 2022 - 2022 IEEE Global Communications Conference · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAge of Information Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
FundersNational Key Research and Development Program of ChinaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsComputer scienceMarkov decision processSatelliteTransmission (telecommunications)ThroughputComputer networkHeterogeneous networkCommunications satelliteThe InternetMarkov processDistributed computingTelecommunicationsEngineeringWirelessWireless network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Satellite communication is regarded as a promising technique for providing connectivity in remote areas, which creates opportunities for data collection and transmission in marine Internet-of-Remote-Things (IoRT) networks. Most existing investigations in the field of satellite access control focus on communication throughput and transmission delay. However, the freshness of information and the heterogeneous satellite networks are rarely considered. To this end, we first present a satellite-based marine IoRT system, where a GEO/LEO heterogeneous network is considered to harness the full potential of existing satellite systems, and the age-of-information (AoI) is introduced to characterize the freshness of the status update information generated by IoRT devices. Then, an optimal age-oriented access control problem is formulated to maintain the freshness of information in the long term. We transform this non-convex sequential decision problem into a model-free Markov Decision Process (MDP) problem and solve it by leveraging the deep reinforcement learning (DRL) framework. Simulation results show that the proposed strategy significantly outperforms the state-of-the-art ones in terms of long-term AoI performance. Moreover, the proposed strategy could make cooperative access decisions and obtain an excellent trade-off between satellites on different layers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGLOBECOM 2022 - 2022 IEEE Global Communications ConferenceSame topicAge of Information OptimizationFrench-language works237,207