Handling big tabular data of ICT supply chains: a multi-task, machine-interpretable approach
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Due to the characteristics of Information and Communications Technology (ICT) products, the critical information of ICT devices is often summarized in big tabular data shared across supply chains. Therefore, it is critical to automatically interpret tabular structures with the surging amount of electronic assets. To transform the tabular data in electronic documents into a machine-interpretable format and provide layout and semantic information for information extraction and interpretation, we define a Table Structure Recognition (TSR) task and a Table Cell Type Classification (CTC) task. We use a graph to represent complex table structures for the TSR task. Meanwhile, table cells are categorized into three groups based on their functional roles for the CTC task, namely Header, Attribute, and Data. Subsequently, we propose a multi-task model to solve the defined two tasks simultaneously by using the text modal and image modal features. Our experimental results show that our proposed method can outperform state-of-the-art methods on ICDAR2013 and UNLV datasets.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.010 | 0.008 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it