Input-Output Selection for LSTM-Based Reduced-Order State Estimator Design
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this work, we propose a sensitivity-based approach to construct reduced-order state estimators based on recurrent neural networks (RNN). It is assumed that a mechanistic model is available but is too computationally complex for estimator design and that only some target outputs are of interest and should be estimated. A reduced-order estimator that can estimate the target outputs is sufficient to address such a problem. We introduce an approach based on sensitivity analysis to determine how to select the appropriate inputs and outputs for data collection and data-driven model development to estimate the desired outputs accurately. Specifically, we consider the long short-term memory (LSTM) neural network, a type of RNN, as the tool to train the data-driven model. Based on it, an extended Kalman filter, a state estimator, is designed to estimate the target outputs. Simulations are carried out to illustrate the effectiveness and applicability of the proposed approach.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it