MS4D-Net: Multitask-Based Semi-Supervised Semantic Segmentation Framework with Perturbed Dual Mean Teachers for Building Damage Assessment from High-Resolution Remote Sensing Imagery
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the aftermath of a natural hazard, rapid and accurate building damage assessment from remote sensing imagery is crucial for disaster response and rescue operations. Although recent deep learning-based studies have made considerable improvements in assessing building damage, most state-of-the-art works focus on pixel-based, multi-stage approaches, which are more complicated and suffer from partial damage recognition issues at the building-instance level. In the meantime, it is usually time-consuming to acquire sufficient labeled samples for deep learning applications, making a conventional supervised learning pipeline with vast annotation data unsuitable in time-critical disaster cases. In this study, we present an end-to-end building damage assessment framework integrating multitask semantic segmentation with semi-supervised learning to tackle these issues. Specifically, a multitask-based Siamese network followed by object-based post-processing is first constructed to solve the semantic inconsistency problem by refining damage classification results with building extraction results. Moreover, to alleviate labeled data scarcity, a consistency regularization-based semi-supervised semantic segmentation scheme with iteratively perturbed dual mean teachers is specially designed, which can significantly reinforce the network perturbations to improve model performance while maintaining high training efficiency. Furthermore, a confidence weighting strategy is embedded into the semi-supervised pipeline to focus on convincing samples and reduce the influence of noisy pseudo-labels. The comprehensive experiments on three benchmark datasets suggest that the proposed method is competitive and effective in building damage assessment under the circumstance of insufficient labels, which offers a potential artificial intelligence-based solution to respond to the urgent need for timeliness and accuracy in disaster events.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".