MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4315866364 · doi:10.3934/matersci.2023006

Modeling the flexural strength of steel fibre reinforced concrete

2023· article· en· W4315866364 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAIMS Materials Science · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicInnovative concrete reinforcement materials
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFlexural strengthMaterials scienceComposite materialUltimate tensile strengthFlexural modulusVolume fractionThree point flexural testSofteningFiber-reinforced concreteStructural engineeringTension (geology)Reinforced concreteEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<abstract> <p>Industrial applications of fibre-reinforced concrete (FRC) in structures require extensive experimental and analytical investigations of the FRC material properties. For design purposes and applications involving the flexural loading of the member, it is essential to have a predictive model for the flexural strength of the FRC material. In the present paper, a fracture mechanics approach based on Bridged Crack Model (BCM) is used to predict the flexural strength of steel fibre-reinforced concrete (SFRC) beams. The model assumes a quadratic tension-softening relationship (σ-δ) governing the bridging action of the steel fibres and a linear profile of the propagating crack. The proposed tension-softening relationship is considered valid for a wide range of fibre-reinforced concrete materials based on the knowledge of either the material micromechanical parameters (such as fibre volume fraction, fibre/matrix bond strength, fibre length, and fibre tensile strength) or an actual experimentally-measured σ-δ relationship. The flexural strength model thus obtained allows the prediction of the flexural strength of SFRC and study the variation of the latter as a function of the micromechanical parameters. An experimental program involving the flexural testing of 13 SFRC prism series was carried out to verify the prediction of the proposed model. The SFRC mixes incorporated two types of steel fibres (straight-end and hooked-end), four different concrete compressive strengths (40, 50, 60, and 70 MPa), three different fibre volume fractions (1, 1.5, and 2%), and three specimen depths (100, 150, and 200 mm). The experimental results were compared to the predictions of the proposed flexural strength model, and a reasonable agreement between the two has been observed. The model provided a useful physical explanation for the observed variation of flexural strength as a function of the test variables investigated in this study.</p> </abstract>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.206
Threshold uncertainty score0.554

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it