MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4317000346 · doi:10.1145/3573074.3573078

On COVID-19 Pandemic-Induced Attitudinal Changes in Software Engineering Teaching and Learning

2023· article· en· W4317000346 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicPersona Design and Applications
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPandemicCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Ephemeral keyPerspective (graphical)SoftwareTransformation (genetics)Computer scienceMathematics educationSoftware engineeringKnowledge managementEngineering ethicsEngineeringPsychologyMedicineChemistryArtificial intelligenceComputer security

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This note outlines certain notable changes observed in the attitudes towards and approaches in teaching and learning software engineeringrelated courses following the end of the COVID-19 pandemic. It views these changes from the interrelated perspectives of the primary stakeholders of software engineering education (SEE), namely administrators, educators, and students. It seems that while some changes may be ephemeral and transient, the others may be essential and permanent. From a students' perspective, the transformation of SEE appears to be generally for the better.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.125
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.190
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.125
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it