MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Assessment of the prevalence and clinical features of cognitive disorders among patients with Lyme disease depending on the stage and clinical manifestation of the disease

2022· article· en· W4317037069 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
T. Yu. Malysh, М.А. Trishchynska, E. L. Panasyuk, A.V. Kostiuchenko, N.V. Tytarenko

Bibliographic record

VenueReports of Vinnytsia National Medical University · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMedicinal Plants and Bioactive Compounds
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOdds ratioLyme diseaseMedicineConfidence intervalDiseaseCognitionClinical psychologyPediatricsInternal medicinePsychiatryImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Annotation. Lyme disease is the most frequent disease among naturally occurring zoonoses. The first cases of tick-borne borreliosis in Ukraine were confirmed in 1994. The disease has been officially registered since 2000. Despite the high prevalence of cognitive and neuropsychological disorders in Lyme borreliosis, data on their frequency and degree of severity are contradictory. The examination of cognitive status is still not included in the standard clinical examination of this category of patients. The purpose of the study is to assess the prevalence and severity of cognitive disorders among patients with Lyme disease depending on the clinical features of the disease. We conducted a case-control study. Thirty-eight (29 women, 9 men) patients aged from 23 to 77 years (average - 48.58±16.81 years) were examined. For each patient, 38 controls matched by gender, age (±5 years), nationality, and place of birth were selected. Mini-Mental Scale Examination (MMSE) and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) were used to assess cognitive function. All obtained data were processed by methods of variational statistics using the statistical package "SPSS 20" (SPSS Inc.) version 21.0.0 for Windows using the Shapiro-Wilk test. Data are presented as M±σ or Me [Q25-Q75]. Depending on the needs, Student's t-test, Mann-Whitney test were used, χ2 (Pearson) and odds ratio (OR), 95% confidence interval (CI), linear correlation coefficient (r) were determined. Lyme disease was associated with a more than threefold increase in the risk of developing cognitive impairment (OR 3.59; 95% CI [1.27-10.14]). Seven patients (18.4%) suffered from mild, 15 (39.5%) had moderate cognitive impairment, and 9 (23.7%) patients were diagnosed with mild dementia. Cognitive disorders were significantly more common in patients with neuroborreliosis (OR 12.44; 95% CI [1.84-84.26]) and the late stage of the disease (OR 6.11; 95% CI [1.1-37.49]). The severity of cognitive impairment according to the MMSE was negatively correlated with the age of onset (r = -0.631, p<0.001) and the duration of the disease (r = -0.406, p=0.011). Prospects for further research are to study and analyze the correlations of cognitive and psychoemotional disorders in patients with various manifestations of Lyme disease.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReports of Vinnytsia National Medical UniversitySame topicMedicinal Plants and Bioactive CompoundsFrench-language works237,207