PSO-Based Joint UAV Positioning and Hybrid Precoding in UAV-Assisted Massive MIMO Systems
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This work studies the joint design of hybrid pre-coding (HP) and optimal positioning of unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) relay in a millimeter-wave (mmWave) multi-user massive multiple-input multiple-output (MU-mMIMO) systems to maximize the spectral and energy efficiencies. The UAV operates as a flying wireless relay, expanding a base station’s coverage and delivering capacity boost to a group of users/devices that are obscured by obstructions. We explore the geometry-based mmWave channel model for the UAV-User link and propose joint HP and UAV positioning scheme (JHPP). In particular, the RF beamformer is designed using singular value decomposition (SVD) of channel matrix by incorporating users’ angle-of-departure (AoD) information to reduce the number of radio frequency (RF) chains, and the baseband (BB) precoder is designed using regularized zero-forcing (RZF) technique to mitigate MU interference. Then, using a particle swarm optimization-based location algorithm (PSO-L), a constrained optimization problem with the goal of maximizing the achievable sum-rate (ASR) is constructed for the optimal UAV placement in the given search space. Illustrative results show that the integration of a UAV relay considerably enhances the performance of mmWave MU-mMIMO systems when the BS is remote. Moreover, compared to UAV random placement in the given flying span, PSO-L based UAV positioning has higher spectral/energy efficiency. Finally, the use of a hemispherical array (HSA) configuration at UAV relay can further increase the performance when compared to uniform rectangular array (URA).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".