Towards a Provably Secure Authentication Protocol for Fog-Driven IoT-Based Systems
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The emergence of fog-based Internet of Things (IoT) systems have played a significant role in enhancing the applicability of the IoT paradigm. In such systems, fog-nodes are proficient enough to retain, process and transmit the data coming from IoT devices. Nevertheless, as an extension of cloud computing, inheriting the security and privacy concerns of cloud computing is also inevitable in fog-based IoT systems. To deal with such challenges, a diverse range of security solutions are reported in the literature. However, most of them have several limitations (i.e., vulnerability to known security attacks and high computation overhead) that curtail their practical implementation applicability. Keeping these limitations in mind, this paper propose a privacy-preserving hash-based authenticated key agreement protocol using XOR and concatenation operations for fog-driven IoT systems. Using healthcare as a case study, the security of the novel protocol is evaluated by using informal and formal security analysis. In order to obtain the experimental results, the key cryptographic operations used at the user, fog node and cloud server-side are implemented on a mobile device, Arduino and cloud server, respectively. Findings from the performance evaluation results show that the proposed protocol has the least computation cost compared to several related competing protocols.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".