MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4317748898 · doi:10.1016/j.bspc.2023.104575

ECG bio-identification using Fréchet classifiers: A proposed methodology based on modeling the dynamic change of the ECG features

2023· article· en· W4317748898 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueBiomedical Signal Processing and Control · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicECG Monitoring and Analysis
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersKing Faisal University
KeywordsComputer sciencePattern recognition (psychology)Artificial intelligenceFeature (linguistics)Feature selectionIdentification (biology)Data mining

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recently, the use of electrocardiogram (ECG) for human identification has attracted great attention. Generally, most existing ECG based biometric systems relay on extracting the static fiducial or non-fiducial features of the cardiac signal. However, the recorded ECG data is more likely to be different whenever it is measured. Such problem can be addressed by utilizing the dynamic change in ECG features. This paper proposes a new methodology for human identification via ECG, based on tracking the dynamic change in ECG features and utilizing the Fréchet distance measures for multiclass classification of feature matrices. The proposed dynamic feature matrices can be utilized to model nonstationary signals because they provide continues information on feature variability. Technically, we utilize the consecutive change of ECG power spectral density as significant feature. In addition, we use the dynamic change of QRS features as a distinguishable characteristic. At the classification stage, we use equations of Fréchet distances to perform multiclass classification because the covariance matrices of the dynamic feature matrices are symmetric positive definite, and their relative geometric space is not Euclidian. The performance of our methodology was evaluated using the publicly available ECG ID database of 62 subjects. To support real world applicability of our method, we randomized the reference / test data selection using data windowing techniques for examining the stability of our method by changing the datasets. The experimental results show that our methodology was able to achieve an identification accuracy of 97.03% with 0.971 precision, 0.999 specificity, 0.97 recall, 0.029 false rejection rate and 0.00048 false acceptance rate. Furthermore, the findings of our work show that Fréchet distances perform better than the Euclidian distance for ECG data classification in the context of multiclass classification problems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.991
Threshold uncertainty score0.302

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.095
GPT teacher head0.347
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it