MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4317790715 · doi:10.2118/212357-ms

Reductions in Emissions and Fuel Cost with Start/Stop System Technology for Diesel Frac Fleets

2023· article· en· W4317790715 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference and Exhibition · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAtmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
Canadian institutionsConocoPhillips (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiesel fuelEngineeringHydraulic fracturingLimitingCash flowBusinessWaste managementEnvironmental economicsNatural resource economicsFinancePetroleum engineeringEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Idling during hydraulic fracturing generates considerable emissions of NOX, CO, and particulate matter (PM). Field studies conducted during 2021-22 documented an average of 5 - 10 hours per day of diesel-powered idling during fracturing operations across multiple U.S. unconventional basins. Prior to 2021 boardroom level corporate environment, social, and governance (ESG) initiatives by oil & gas producers focused on limiting gas leaks, Scope 1 (direct corporate) emissions, and overall carbon footprints. Controlling emissions during the idling of hydraulic fracturing equipment, until recently, had not been a high priority on executive ESG lists. "The name of the game in unconventional shale development has quickly shifted from production at all costs to maximizing cash flow and reducing emissions to improve ESG performance. Operators have placed a priority on their ESG efforts as financial institutions have prioritized responsible investing." (Walzel, B. et.al., 2021). By late 2021 concerns associated with idling during fracturing operations drew more attention from operators. The issues of idle waste control (unnecessary emissions, fuel, and excessive maintenance cost), identified as easy to resolve, garnered limited attention. Yet by early 2022, the challenges associated with frac diesel idling remained prevalent and became more acute with the dramatic rise in diesel costs. In early 2022 ESG surveys began to include mention of frac idle waste. Contributing to this is the fact U.S. frac fleets continued utilizing diesel and/or dual fuel (diesel combined with natural gas) engines for 91% of fracturing operations. One of the lesser-known characteristics of Tier 2 and Tier 4 diesel frac pump engines is the fact they burn 100% diesel during idling – including dual fuel engines. Stop/Start technology, first adopted in the auto industry and later by long haul diesel-powered trucking companies, began gaining traction within the oil & gas industry in 2017. The reduction in idle times attributed to Start/Stop systems proved lower fuel consumption and emissions generation rates were possible. This study focuses on the contributions made by diesel Start/Stop technologies. Positive results from 2019 forward substantiate the efficacy of idle reduction methods used in conjunction with hydraulic fracturing. Limiting frac idle times proved effective in reducing frac emissions, lowering fuel consumption, as well as cutting maintenance costs for hydraulic fracturing fleets. This report highlights a new Start/Stop technology with field results from 2021 – 2022. This recent technology delivered a simpler, innovative hydraulic start centralized plug & play method of powering an entire frac fleet rather than using multiple Start/Stop systems installed to electrically start each individual frac pump. The results of a 2022 Permian basin technology field application are presented here.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.457
Threshold uncertainty score0.728

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it