MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Using Deep Learning for Simulation of Real time Video Streaming Applications

2022· article· en· W4317792686 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venue2022 Winter Simulation Conference (WSC) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicIoT and Edge/Fog Computing
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceCloud computingAnalyticsQueueing theoryBig dataReal-time computingData modelingDeep learningLatency (audio)Artificial intelligenceDistributed computingMachine learningData miningComputer networkDatabaseOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The traditional approaches for simulation of video analytics applications suffer from the lack of real-data generated by employed machine learning techniques. Machine learning methods need huge data that causes network congestion and high latency in cloud-based networks. This paper proposes a novel method for performance measurement and simulation of video analytics applications to evaluate the solutions addressing the cloud congestion problem. The proposed simulation is achieved by building a model prototype called Video Analytic Data Reduction Model (VADRM) that divides video analytic jobs into smaller tasks with fewer processing requirements to run on edge networking. Real data generated from VADRM prototype is characterized and tested by curve fitting to find the distribution models for generating the larger number of artificial data for resource management simulation. Distribution models based on real data of CNN-based VADRM prototype are used to build a queueing model and comprehensive simulation of real-time video analytics applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.930
Threshold uncertainty score0.834

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it