Fine-Grained Early Frequency Attention for Deep Speaker Representation Learning
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Deep learning techniques have considerably improved speech processing in recent years. Speaker representations extracted by deep learning models are being used in a wide range of tasks, such as speaker recognition and speech emotion recognition. Attention mechanisms have started to play an important role in improving deep learning models in the field of speech processing. Nonetheless, despite the fact that important speaker-related information can be embedded in individual frequency-bins of the input spectral representations, current attention models are unable to attend to fine-grained information items in spectral representations. In this article, we propose Fine-grained Early Frequency Attention (FEFA) for speaker representation learning. Our model is a simple and lightweight model that can be integrated into various convolutional neural networks (CNN) pipelines and is capable of focusing on information items as small as frequency-bins. We evaluate the proposed model on three tasks of speaker recognition, speech emotion recognition, and spoken digit recognition. We use three widely used public datasets, namely VoxCeleb, IEMOCAP, and free spoken digit dataset for our experiments. We attach FEFA to several prominent deep learning models and evaluate its impact on the final performance. We also compare our work with other related works in the area. Our experiments show that by adding FEFA to different CNN architectures, performance is consistently improved by substantial margins, and the models equipped with FEFA outperform all the other attentive models. We also test our model against different levels of the added noise showing improvements in robustness and less sensitivity compared to the backbone networks.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".