MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Neuro-heuristic Pallet Detection for Automated Guided Vehicle Navigation

2022· article· en· W4318185035 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venue2022 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Manufacturing and Logistics Optimization
Canadian institutionsBrandon University
FundersSilesian University of Technology
KeywordsHeuristicsComputer sciencePalletFocus (optics)AutomationHeuristicArtificial intelligenceComputer visionPoint (geometry)RobotReal-time computingEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Automated guided vehicles (AGV) allow for the automation of operations in warehouse environments. From an application point of view, vehicles can use sensors to move and perform a variety of tasks, including moving objects. In this paper, we focus on the analysis of the environment and the preparation of data for vehicle navigation. The proposed solution is based on two paths of action. In the first, the image of the room is processed by heuristics to locate the robot’s target - the palette. The found pattern allows one to locate the destination as well as create a mask. The mask can be used to train the U-Net network. When a network is trained, the use of heuristics for pallet location can be omitted. Locating the target allows the image to be processed to obtain an AGV navigation map. The proposed solution based on heuristics and U-Net networks has been described and tested in simulations to indicate the potential of the proposed approach.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.942
Threshold uncertainty score0.991

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.241
GPT teacher head0.340
Teacher spread0.099 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it