MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4318332820 · doi:10.23952/jano.5.2023.1.08

The fixed point property of quasi-point-separable topological vector spaces

2023· article· en· W4318332820 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied and Numerical Optimization · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicFixed Point Theorems Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProperty (philosophy)Separable spaceFixed-point propertyMathematicsTopology (electrical circuits)Locally convex topological vector spacePoint (geometry)Pure mathematicsTopological vector spaceTopological spaceMathematical analysisFixed-point theoremCombinatoricsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we introduce a new concept of quasi-point-separable topological vector spaces, which has the following important properties: (1) in general, the conditions for a topological vector space to be quasi-point-separable is not difficult to verify; (2) the class of quasi-point-separable topological vector spaces is large and includes locally convex topological vector spaces and pseudonorm adjoint topological vector spaces as special cases; (3) every quasi-point-separable Housdorrf topological vector space has the fixed point property (that is, every continuous self-mapping on any given nonempty closed and convex subset has a fixed point), which is the result of the main theorem of this paper.Finally, we provide some concrete examples of quasi-point-separable topological vector spaces, which are not locally convex.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.749
Threshold uncertainty score0.244

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it