MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4318701959 · doi:10.1086/722575

Capital Prospects: Jamaica and the Environmental History of Postwar Decolonization

2023· article· en· W4318701959 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEnvironmental History · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCaribbean history, culture, and politics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCapitalismColonialismCapital (architecture)EmpireBauxiteDecolonizationEnvironmental historyEconomyWorld War IIPolitical scienceEconomic historyPolitical economyGeographyHistoryEconomicsArchaeologyLawPolitics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the 1940s and 1950s, North American corporations made colonial Jamaica the world’s largest producer of bauxite, the raw material required to smelt aluminum. This industrial transformation was part of a transimperial project, as British and American diplomats worked with industrialists to reconstruct the world capitalist economy after the Second World War. Although much has been written about the history of bauxite in Jamaica, scholars have paid little attention to the conflicts between peasants and prospectors that underpinned the industry’s rise and expansion. As this article argues, corporate prospecting drove a transformation in property that enabled firms to invest in mining and, as a result, dispossess tens of thousands of Jamaicans of their land. But the expansion of capitalism at the end of empire did not just mark the Jamaican countryside. The history of environmental and social change was decided there, through conflicts between peasants and prospectors over land and property.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.593
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.004
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it