MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4319010148 · doi:10.3905/jod.2023.1.176

The Leland Model as a Consistent Framework for Analytic Valuation of Equity and Options on Equity

2023· article· en· W4319010148 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Derivatives · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicCapital Investment and Risk Analysis
Canadian institutionsTrinity College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEquity (law)Equity capital marketsValuation (finance)EconomicsEquity riskFinancial economicsValuation of optionsEquity valueExotic optionDebtBusinessFinanceExternal debtPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Although there are many well-established models for valuing corporate debt and equity, option pricing literature rarely takes these models as their starting point. This happens in part because such models value equity as an option on the firm’s assets, and options on equity then become compound options that cannot generally be priced analytically. In this article, the authors present a consistent and unified framework for valuing equity and options on equity within the 1994 Leland model. The authors show that it is possible to value not only European call and put options but also exotic options such as barriers and lookbacks in closed form. Moreover, the authors show that the model produces an implied volatility skew that is typically observed in the equity options market.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.091
Threshold uncertainty score0.174

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.218
GPT teacher head0.368
Teacher spread0.150 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it