MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4319264596 · doi:10.1353/tech.2023.0038

Fixing Niagara Falls: Environment, Energy, and Engineers at the World's Most Famous Waterfall by Daniel Macfarlane

2023· article· en· W4319264596 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueTechnology and Culture · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicDiverse Historical and Scientific Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWaterfallArt historyEngineeringManagementArchaeologyHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Fixing Niagara Falls: Environment, Energy, and Engineers at the World's Most Famous Waterfall by Daniel Macfarlane Donald C. Jackson (bio) Fixing Niagara Falls: Environment, Energy, and Engineers at the World's Most Famous Waterfall By Daniel Macfarlane. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press, 2020. Pp. 274. With a natural discharge averaging about 200,000 cubic feet per second (cfs) and plunging some 150 feet over a sharp precipice in the Niagara River north of Buffalo, New York, Niagara Falls stands as one of the world's greatest visual wonders. And for historians of electric power, Niagara Falls is also renowned in the development of high-voltage, polyphase alternating current (AC) technology. Bringing together these environmental and technological perspectives, Daniel Macfarlane presents a captivating enviro-tech story documenting how, via "remedial works" that include an upstream diversion/control dam and a shortening of the rim at Horseshoe Falls, the sublime falls waterscape has been sublimated into a human-fabricated hydropower system. The goal of engineers has been to draw as much energy as possible from the Niagara River while maintaining sufficient flow so that a diminished falls does not disappoint tourists and honeymooners. As Macfarlane explains, "[twentieth century] technocrats concealed the industrialization of Niagara's waterscape by helping the Falls resemble their past appearance." Simply stated, modern-day "Niagara Falls is in fact quite unnatural" (p. 9). [End Page 288] First publicized by Euro-Americans in the seventeenth century, Niagara Falls began to flourish as a tourist destination after completion of the Erie Canal in 1825. The falls flowed largely unimpeded until the advent of electric power technology in the 1890s brought about huge diversions into the penstocks of the Adams Power Plant along the American shore. Macfarlane ably discusses Niagara Falls' importance in AC innovation, but he wisely notes that "Niagara's firstness does get exaggerated … for example, framing Niagara Falls as the birthplace of hydroelectricity was good for Westinghouse and bad for General Electric" (p. 37). For the record, America's first commercial three-phase AC transmission line reached Redlands, California, in the fall of 1893 using GE equipment—power generated at Niagara Falls using Westinghouse AC technology did not come online until August 1895. With the coming of World War I, industrial demand for Niagara power grew, and, with the falls sited astride the Canadian-U.S. border, Macfarlane is drawn into the complicated story of international diplomacy and treaty-making that continues to guide how Niagara River flow is controlled and distributed. As part of this exploration, the publicly owned Canadian authority Ontario Hydro is contrasted with the privately owned U.S.-based Niagara Falls Power Company and other local electrochemical enterprises; in the 1950s, the Robert Moses–controlled Power Authority of the State of New York (PASNY) became a major player in a politically charged, high-stakes hydropower chess game. Contemporaneously with the arrival of PASNY, engineers constructed elaborate-scale models of the Niagara River so that "remedial works" in the streambed could be designed to maximize power generation and (hopefully) ensure enough flow over the falls to placate the tourist industry. Among the book's highlights is Macfarlane's chapter on how hydraulic modeling of the riverscape in the 1950s helped engender a protocol wherein discharge over the falls is reduced from 100,000 cfs during the day to 50,000 cfs overnight (when tourists are asleep) and then brought back to 100,000 cfs the next morning. Another highlight describes how the PASNY power plant and pumped storage unit encroached on the Tuscarora Nation Indian Reservation and how, at Moses's behest, PASNY legally battled the tribe to force it to relinquish its land with minimal compensation. In sum, Macfarlane has crafted an exemplary work of scholarship drawing from an expansive range of primary and secondary sources. Utilizing dozens of photographs and maps to supplement the voluminous written record, he offers an insightful narrative analyzing how, for more than a century, actors on both sides of the Canadian-U.S. border have sought to preserve a sense of the natural fallscape while simultaneously maximizing hydropower. In telling this story, he reminds us that much of what we think of as...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.491
Threshold uncertainty score0.594

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.171
Teacher spread0.160 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it