Learning Style Subspaces for Controllable Unpaired Domain Translation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The unpaired domain-to-domain translation aims to learn inter-domain relationships between diverse modalities without relying on paired data, which can help complex structure prediction tasks such as age transformation where it is challenging to attain paired samples. A common approach used by most current methods is to factorize the data into a domain-invariant content space and a domain-specific style space. In this work, we argue that the style space can be further decomposed into smaller subspaces. Learning these style subspaces has two-fold advantages: (i) it allows more robustness and reliability in the generation of images in unpaired domain translation; and (ii) it allows better control and thereby interpolation of the latent space, which can be helpful in complex translation tasks involving multiple domains. To achieve this decomposition, we propose a novel scalable approach to partition the latent space into style subspaces. We also propose a new evaluation metric that quantifies the controllable generation capability of domain translation methods. We compare our proposed method with several strong baselines on standard domain translation tasks such as gender translation (male-to-female and female-to-male), age transformation, reference-guided image synthesis, multi-domain image translation and multi-attribute domain translation on celebA-HQ and AFHQ datasets. The proposed technique achieves state-of-the-art performance on various domain translation tasks while outperforming all the baselines on controllable generation tasks. Code - https://github.com/GauravBh1010tt/Controllable-Domain-Translation
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".