Multivariate Probabilistic Monocular 3D Object Detection
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In autonomous driving, monocular 3D object detection is an important but challenging task. Towards accurate monocular 3D object detection, some recent methods recover the distance of objects from the physical height and visual height of objects. Such decomposition framework can introduce explicit constraints on the distance prediction, thus improving its accuracy and robustness. However, the inaccurate physical height and visual height prediction still may exacerbate the inaccuracy of the distance prediction. In this paper, we improve the framework by multivariate probabilistic modeling. We explicitly model the joint probability distribution of the physical height and visual height. This is achieved by learning a full covariance matrix of the physical height and visual height during training, with the guide of a multivariate likelihood. Such explicit joint probability distribution modeling not only leads to robust distance prediction when both the predicted physical height and visual height are inaccurate, but also brings learned covariance matrices with expected behaviors. The experimental results on the challenging Waymo Open and KITTI datasets show the effectiveness of our framework <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">1</sup> .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it